Shana Stites, PsyD, MA,MS​

Distributed by:

Issued to

Shana Stites, PsyD, MA,MS​

Want to report a typo or a mistake?

Credential Verification

Issue date: June 5, 2025

ID: 37e0a3b1-b33c-4e3d-bc0c-8aea99f363d7

Issued by

National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC)

NACC was established in 1999 by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and serves as the centralized data repository, collaboration, and communication hub for the NIA’s Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers (ADRC) Program.

Type

Program

Level

Professional

Format

Hybrid

Price

Free

Description

The New Investigator Award Program (NIAP), launched by the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) in partnership with the Alzheimer's Association, is a prestigious funding opportunity designed to foster the career development of early-career investigators in the field of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (AD/ADRD) research. This program aims to encourage new and early career investigators to develop innovative research projects, foster collaborations within their Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC) and across the ADRC network and support their journey toward becoming independent researchers. Proposals undergo a thorough, multi-stage review to assess scientific and technical merit. This process involves multiple organizations and committees, including NACC, the Alzheimer's Association, NACC’s Scientific Review Committee (SRC), and Ad-Hoc Review Committee. All reviews are conducted by the SRC and Ad-Hoc Committee. For the 2025 NIAP cycle, proposals are evaluated and scored based on criteria relevant to both social/behavioral and biomedical aspects of AD/ADRD research.

Skills

Reviewing Applications

Earning Criteria

Participation

Sign up to act as a NIAP Reviewer  Provide scientific keywords, research areas of expertise, and bio-sketch Review multiple applications/proposals and provide comments and scores by section as well as overall score  Prepare for review calls Participate in application review calls Present overall scores and highlights of reviewer comments when/if asked to act as a Discussant for proposals